Note: This is a fork of the original project by 3v1n0 (Marco Trevisan). All credit for the original driver goes to him and the contributors listed below. We forked this project solely to fix a build compatibility issue with newer versions of
libfprint-2-tod, and to document a working installation process for modern Ubuntu (24.04) and kernel 6.17+.
The original driver failed to compile against newer versions of libfprint-2-tod (1.94.7+tod1 and later) due to an API change in fpi_ssm_next_state_delayed — the function's third argument (GDestroyNotify) was removed upstream. This caused two hard compilation errors:
error: too many arguments to function 'fpi_ssm_next_state_delayed'
Fix: Removed the trailing NULL argument from both call sites in vfs0090.c:
led_blink_callback_with_ssm()— line 1632reactivate_ssm()— line 2954
The original HMAC path used NSS PK11 helpers for TLS record authentication. On some modern Ubuntu 24.04 systems, PK11_GetBestSlot(CKM_SHA256_HMAC) can return NULL; the old code passed that null slot into PK11_ImportSymKey, which can crash fprintd during verification or login.
Fix: Use OpenSSL HMAC(EVP_sha256()) for SHA-256 HMAC generation and propagate encryption failures through libfprint errors instead of dereferencing invalid NSS state.
Tested on:
- Hardware: ThinkPad X1 Carbon 4th Gen (fingerprint sensor
138a:0090/ VFS7500) - OS: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
- Kernel: 6.17.0
- fprintd: 1.94.3
- libfprint-2-tod: 1.94.7+tod1
- Verification:
fprintd-verifyreturnsverify-matchandfprintd.serviceremains stable
If you're on a modern Ubuntu (22.04+) and the PPA approach below doesn't work, build from source:
# 1. Install build dependencies
sudo apt install -y meson ninja-build libfprint-2-dev libfprint-2-tod-dev \
libnss3-dev libssl-dev libpixman-1-dev
# 2. Clone this repo
git clone https://github.com/speed785/validity-vfs0090-linux-driver.git
cd libfprint-tod-vfs0090
# 3. Configure and build
meson setup builddir
ninja -C builddir
# 4. Install driver and udev rules
sudo ninja -C builddir install
sudo cp 60-libfprint-2-tod-vfs0090.rules /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/
# 5. Initialize the sensor (if not already done)
sudo snap install validity-sensors-tools
sudo snap connect validity-sensors-tools:raw-usb
sudo bash -c 'cd /tmp && echo "" | validity-sensors-tools.initializer'
# Note: "Flash is already partitioned" is normal if sensor was previously initialized
# 6. Disable python-validity if installed (conflicts with this driver)
sudo systemctl mask python3-validity open-fprintd
sudo systemctl stop python3-validity open-fprintd
# 7. Make sure standard fprintd is running
sudo apt install -y fprintd
sudo systemctl start fprintd
sudo udevadm control --reload-rules && sudo udevadm trigger
# 8. Enroll your fingerprints
fprintd-enroll -f <finger-name> "$USER"Then enable fingerprint login in Settings → Users → Fingerprint Login.
Thanks to the amazing work that nmikhailov did in his prototype and uunicorn in python-validity and synaWudfBioUsb-sandbox, I spent some time in getting a libfprint driver for the 138a:0090 (and 138a:0097) device up...
- It only works if the device has been initialized using validity-sensors-tools/
- Alernatively, but it's less secure, you can use a Windows installation with VirtualBox (sharing USB) guest or with a Windows installation in bare metal
- Most of the device interaction and crypto code is coming from the prototype, so basically it needs lots of cleanup, but I hope to rebase this on the code from python-validity
- Here enroll, verification, led and all the operations work
- It uses libfprint image comparison algorithm, we might move to in-device check later.
You can test it using the libfprint examples or just using fprintd-* tools (GNOME supports it natively from control center).
I racommend using the validity-sensors-tools/, you can install it in any distro as snap, or you can use it manually from sources located in my python validity fork
sudo snap install validity-sensors-tools
# Give it access to the usb devices
sudo snap connect validity-sensors-tools:raw-usb
# Initialize the device
sudo validity-sensors-tools.initializer
# Test the device
sudo validity-sensors-tools.led_test
# This is needed and only works in 138a:0097:
sudo validity-sensors-tools.enroll --finger-id [0-9]
# See other available tools
validity-sensors-tools --helpThis is the only supported way by 138a:0097, so once you've enrolled your fingers with validity-sensors-tools.enroll you will be able to re-enroll your fingers in fprintd to use them in linux as well.
This unfortunately can't be done in 138a:0090, but you can still use a Windows installation (even in VirtualBox) to enroll the prints to save them in the chip and enable the match-on-sensor, this can make the verification faster, safer and higher quality.
Unfortunately there's currently no easy way to implement this in this driver without reverse-engineer the fingerprint template creation that the windows drivers does in host.
If you're using ubuntu just use this PPA to get the libfprint TOD packages with vfs0090 sensor support.
You can enroll your fingers by using the fprintd-enroll utility or from UI using unity-control-center user-accounts in unity or gnome-control-center user-accounts in GNOME (it's the same as going in System settings -> User accounts pane and enable the fingerprint login).
So, in steps (for ubuntu) it would be:
# Initialize the device
sudo snap install validity-sensors-tools
sudo snap connect validity-sensors-tools:raw-usb
sudo validity-sensors-tools.initializer
# Add the repository and install the tod package (supports both chips)
sudo add-apt-repository -u ppa:3v1n0/libfprint-vfs0090
sudo apt install libfprint-2-tod-vfs0090Then go in system settings (account) and enable the fingerprint login
The TOD module will likely not work in your installation unless you won't install libfprint-tod, so just use my libfprint-vfs0090 fork.
for finger in {left,right}-{thumb,{index,middle,ring,little}-finger}; do fprintd-enroll -f "$finger" "$USER"; doneI've no hardware using that device, so any help is appreciated.
It would be nice if you could help in tuning the value of the bz3_threshold, as that's the value that defines how different should be the prints, and so it's important for having better security. I've set it to 12 currently, but of course increasing the number of prints we enroll or the image quality that could be increased.
Using fprint_demo or monitor fprintd from journalctl you should be able to see the values such as fpi_img_detect_minutiae and fpi_img_compare_print_data in the log, like
fp:debug [fpi_img_new] length=82944
fp:debug [fpi_imgdev_image_captured]
fp:debug [fpi_img_detect_minutiae] minutiae scan completed in 0,080257 secs
fp:debug [fpi_img_detect_minutiae] detected 18 minutiae
fp:debug [print_data_new] driver=15 devtype=0000
fp:debug [fpi_img_compare_print_data] score 9
fp:debug [fpi_img_compare_print_data] score 12
fp:debug [fpi_img_compare_print_data] score 18
fp:debug [fpi_img_compare_print_data] score 10
fp:debug [fpi_img_compare_print_data] score 12
The score is the value the print got for you, compared to each sample that fprint saves... And to match it needs to reach the said threshold (so 12 for now). For my fingers this value seems secure enough, but.... Let's see if we can increase it.
