Skip to content

Pagy I18n locale option is not validated before being used in a file path

Moderate
ddnexus published GHSA-2xmw-f8j8-wfxc Jun 8, 2026

Package

bundler pagy (RubyGems)

Affected versions

>= 43.0.0, < 43.5.6

Patched versions

43.5.6

Description

Summary

Pagy::I18n.locale= did not validate its argument before using it as a
path component to load the matching dictionary file (<locale>.yml). An
application that assigns untrusted input to the locale — e.g. the common
pattern Pagy::I18n.locale = params[:locale] — let that input influence
which file Pagy attempted to load.

Details

The setter stored the value as-is, and the loader joined it into a path
and read it:

# gem/lib/pagy/modules/i18n/i18n.rb
def locale=(value)
  Thread.current[:pagy_locale] = value.to_s
end

# ...later, when translating:
path = pathnames.reverse.map { |p| p.join("#{locale}.yml") }.find(&:exist?)
dictionary = YAML.load_file(path)[locale]

Because the locale was used verbatim, a value such as an absolute path or
a ../-style string redirected the lookup outside the locales directory.
Pagy's subsequent structural check (dictionary['pagy']['p11n'])
prevents the file's contents from being returned, so this is not a
direct file read.

Fixed in 43.5.6 by constraining the locale to a BCP 47 shape before use:

LOCALE_PATTERN = /\A[a-zA-Z]{2,8}(-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,8})*\z/

def locale=(value)
  Thread.current[:pagy_locale] = value.to_s[LOCALE_PATTERN]
end

Any non-matching value (including nil) resolves to the default locale
and never reaches the file lookup.

PoC

In an application that sets Pagy::I18n.locale = params[:locale], the
loader appends .yml and reads <locale>.yml, so the request param
controls the target path. For example, pointing it at the app's
config/database.yml:

  1. Send a request with ?locale=../../../config/database (adjust the
    number of ../ to reach the app root from the gem's locales/
    directory).
  2. Pagy calls YAML.load_file on the resulting …/config/database.yml.
  3. The outcome differs by whether that .yml exists, is readable, parses
    as YAML, and has Pagy's expected structure — an existing, readable
    config/database.yml raises a different error than a non-existent
    path (which silently falls back to the default locale). This yields a
    file-existence / readability oracle for .yml paths, and the targeted
    file is read into the process during the attempt.

Impact

Information disclosure (CWE-22 / CWE-200): a file-existence / readability
oracle for .yml paths on the host, plus a server-side read of
attacker-chosen files into the process. The file contents are not
returned in the response.

Only applications that pass unsanitized end-user input into
Pagy::I18n.locale= are affected. Applications that set the locale from
trusted values are not affected.

Patched: pagy 43.5.6.
Workaround (if you cannot upgrade): validate the locale before
assigning it, e.g.
Pagy::I18n.locale = params[:locale].to_s[/\A[a-zA-Z]{2,8}(-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,8})*\z/],
or restrict it to your known set of locales.

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54659

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits