Skip to content

Support for Mop mode, Support for (dynamic/multiple) Maps#3

Open
ultimate-tester wants to merge 12 commits into
clarinetJWD:mainfrom
ultimate-tester:main
Open

Support for Mop mode, Support for (dynamic/multiple) Maps#3
ultimate-tester wants to merge 12 commits into
clarinetJWD:mainfrom
ultimate-tester:main

Conversation

@ultimate-tester

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi there! I gave this beautiful card some attention over the weekend which I'd like to PR before it grows too large to merge easily.
I added the following:

  • Support for Mop mode This adds a dropdown menu at the top of the card, right next to the fan speed. Entity needs to be set using mop_intensity configuration item.
  • Support for Multiple Maps There was already support for one map, but what if you have defined multiple maps in your vacuum? Using the configuration item selected_map you can set the similarly named entity that some vacuums offer (like my Roborock S7), it will lookup the maps you have and list them in a dropdown menu at the top of the card. You can easily switch the map that way. Added bonus: if you use this configuration item, it will also automatically use the set map to show the map (only while the robot is running!). This means you no longer need to manually set the map using the map configuration item.

@killi199

killi199 commented May 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

There is already a PR for the mop mode: 130404

@roumano

roumano commented Apr 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @ultimate-tester , can you update your PR with one the Support for (dynamic/multiple) Maps ?

Regards

@ultimate-tester

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @ultimate-tester , can you update your PR with one the Support for (dynamic/multiple) Maps ?

Regards

You mean only the support for maps?

@roumano

roumano commented Apr 13, 2026 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants