feat: add support for multiple tools in run_until_tool_used#345
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
This makes sense and I see the value of it. Thanks for the updated docs and tests! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey 👋
First of all, thanks a lot for this repo ❤️
This PR adds support for adding multiple tools in
LLMChain.run_until_tool_usedin case you want to exit the loop early when either of multiple tools are called.Our use-case specifically was that we wanted to delete some messages to keep the context window low when a specific tool was called – and then we continue with the execution until a tool signalizing a complete end of the chain is called.
Let me know if that's something you'd consider adding and if so, if you'd implement this differently. I'm new to using
LangChain, so I wouldn't be surprised if there was a better way to go about this that I'm not aware of 😉