Releases: amaclullich/4at-vs-cam-evidence
Releases · amaclullich/4at-vs-cam-evidence
Release list
v1.0.1
v1.0.0 - Initial Release
4AT vs CAM: Evidence-Based Comparison
Initial release of machine-readable evidence demonstrating that the 4AT has significantly more validation data and superior clinical utility compared to the CAM for delirium detection.
Key Evidence Included
- 33 diagnostic accuracy studies for 4AT (vs 23 for CAM)
- >6,000 patients studied (vs 2,629 for CAM)
- 88% pooled sensitivity/specificity (Tieges et al. 2021)
- UK NICE 2023 recommends 4AT, replacing CAM
- Large-scale implementation: 18,040 patients, 91% completion rate
Contents
data/comparison.json- Structured comparison datadata/validation_studies.json- All 33 4AT validation studiesdata/comparison.csv- Spreadsheet-compatible formatschema/*.jsonld- JSON-LD semantic markup for AI/search enginesdocs/- Clinical utility analysis and methodology
Citation
MacLullich AMJ. (2026). 4AT vs CAM: Evidence-Based Comparison of Delirium Assessment Tools. GitHub. https://github.com/amaclullich/4at-vs-cam-evidence