-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 557
Allow Preview User to download files without requiring a Guestbook Re… #12548
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
stevenwinship
wants to merge
5
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
12535-download-without-guestbook-response-for-preview-user
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
944924c
Allow Preview User to download files without requiring a Guestbook Re…
stevenwinship 3143438
comment fix for preview url user download access
stevenwinship 0503d9d
fix release notes per review comment
stevenwinship 6398545
set token in privateUrlUser in PrivateUrlServiceBean
stevenwinship 4477597
refactor based on review comment
stevenwinship File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions
2
doc/release-notes/12535-download-without-guestbook-response-for-preview-user.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| ## Bug ## | ||
| Preview URL users could not download files from the dataset being previewed if a guestbook was assigned to that dataset. This is now fixed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that you set the token in the PrivateUrlUser, is there any reason you can't generate the required signed URL in the same method, e.g.
dataverse/src/main/java/edu/harvard/iq/dataverse/api/Access.java
Lines 584 to 608 in 72a5ad2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not fully understanding your comment. The signing happens in 2 places.
When the access call compares the token hash of the signed url it doesn't match if the signed token was generated using "/api/access/..."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding. My assumption is that this case is similar to the case of a dataset creator downloading from the draft - just a different type of user and different key. So I expected to see some code right where signing for an authenticated user happened to also sign for a privateUulUser - same url, same signing code, just a difference in getting the signing key for this case - versus a new method to generate and sign a URL for this case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The dataset creator downloading from draft includes the auth key in the header. The preview user has a token in the query params. in order to propagate the fact that it's a preview user and not a guest the url needs to be signed. This allows the SignedUrlAuthMechanism to authenticate a PrivateUrlUser based on the user=!{datasetId} and the token from the datasetId