Tweet alternating bioRxiv / medRxiv comments

[cgreene]

Most medRxiv comments in the last few weeks have been about masks or an ivermectin preprint. In the interests of increasing the scope of comments that we display, I wonder if we should do one or both of:

• Tweet alternating between bioRxiv and medRxiv as sources (if disqus separates them)
• Favor comments on papers that have not yet been tweeted about