Skip to content

llm-integration.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
155 lines (114 loc) · 5.16 KB

llm-integration.md

File metadata and controls

155 lines (114 loc) · 5.16 KB
Raw

LLM Integration Principles

This document outlines the principles, patterns, and best practices for integrating Google Gemini API into BMX's knowledge processing pipeline.

Core Principles

BMX's LLM integration prioritizes these output characteristics in order:

  1. Factual: Accurate to source material, no hallucinations
  2. Verifiable: Traceable to original sources with clear attribution
  3. Holistic: Leverages graph connections for comprehensive understanding
  4. Concise: Effectively summarized while preserving essential information

LLM Choice: Google Gemini API

Rationale:

  • Strong performance on complex reasoning tasks
  • Excellent integration with Google Cloud ecosystem
  • Competitive pricing for production usage
  • Good handling of long context windows for document processing

Integration Patterns

1. Document Summarization

Use Case: Condense large documents into structured summaries

Pattern:

prompt = """Summarize the core arguments, key findings, and main topics of the following text. 
Identify the primary purpose or thesis if apparent. 
Aim for a concise yet comprehensive summary (300-500 words).

Text: {document_content}
"""

Output Format: Structured text with clear sections for main arguments, key findings, and conclusions.

2. Entity & Relationship Extraction

Use Case: Extract structured knowledge elements from text

Pattern:

prompt = """From the following text, identify key named entities and relationships.
Output as JSON with 'entities' and 'relationships' keys.

Entity types: Person, Organization, Concept, Theory, Publication, Location
Relationship types: DISCUSSES, CITES, CRITIQUES, EXPANDS_ON, CONTRASTS_WITH

Text: {summary_or_content}
"""

Output Format: Structured JSON for direct database integration.

3. Cross-Document Analysis

Use Case: Identify connections between documents in the knowledge graph

Pattern:

prompt = """Compare these documents and identify connections, similarities, and contrasts.
Focus on shared entities, complementary arguments, and intellectual relationships.

Document 1: {doc1_summary}
Document 2: {doc2_summary}
"""

Output Format: Structured analysis highlighting connections for graph relationship creation.

4. Query Enhancement

Use Case: Improve user queries by leveraging graph context

Pattern:

prompt = """Using the following knowledge graph context, provide a comprehensive answer to the user's question.
Include relevant entities, relationships, and source attribution.

Context: {graph_context}
Question: {user_question}
"""

Output Format: Natural language response with clear source attribution.

Quality Assurance

Source Attribution

  • Always include source document references in LLM outputs
  • Maintain traceability from generated content back to original sources
  • Use structured metadata to track provenance chains

Hallucination Prevention

  • Use specific, constrained prompts that focus on source material
  • Implement confidence scoring for extracted entities and relationships
  • Cross-validate LLM outputs against source documents
  • Use temperature settings that favor accuracy over creativity

Consistency Checks

  • Compare entity extractions across similar documents
  • Validate relationship types against predefined schemas
  • Monitor for contradictory information across the knowledge base

Error Handling

API Failures

  • Implement exponential backoff for rate limiting
  • Graceful degradation when LLM services are unavailable
  • Fallback to rule-based processing for critical operations

Content Validation

  • Validate JSON outputs against expected schemas
  • Handle malformed responses with appropriate error logging
  • Retry with modified prompts for consistently problematic content

Performance Monitoring

  • Track API response times and token usage
  • Monitor extraction quality metrics
  • Set up alerts for unusual patterns or failures

Cost Optimization

Token Management

  • Optimize prompt length while maintaining effectiveness
  • Use document chunking for very large texts
  • Cache frequent queries and common extractions

Batch Processing

  • Group similar operations to reduce API overhead
  • Use asynchronous processing for non-interactive operations
  • Implement intelligent queuing for workload management

Model Selection

  • Use appropriate model variants based on task complexity
  • Consider local models for simple extraction tasks
  • Balance cost with accuracy requirements

Future Enhancements

Advanced Reasoning

  • Chain-of-thought prompting for complex analysis
  • Multi-step reasoning for knowledge synthesis
  • Collaborative filtering with graph algorithms

Specialized Models

  • Fine-tuned models for domain-specific extraction
  • Custom prompts for different document types
  • Adaptive processing based on content characteristics

Integration Patterns

  • Real-time processing for live content streams
  • Incremental updates for evolving knowledge bases
  • Cross-modal processing for multimedia content

This framework ensures that LLM integration enhances BMX's knowledge processing capabilities while maintaining high standards for accuracy, traceability, and system reliability.