|
1 | | -To do |
| 1 | +Observe that for each $n \in \mathbb{Z}^{+}$, |
| 2 | +the binomial coefficient $\mbinom{2 n - 1}{n}$ is a multiple of the primes in the range $n < p \leq 2 n - 1$, |
| 3 | +and thus: |
| 4 | +\begin{equation*} |
| 5 | + \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{p \text{ prime}}}{n < p < 2 n}} {\mspace{-10mu} p} \mspace{2mu} |
| 6 | + \leq \binom{2 n - 1}{n} |
| 7 | + \leq \, 4^{n - 1} |
| 8 | +\end{equation*} |
| 9 | +where the last inequality comes from: |
| 10 | +\begin{equation*} |
| 11 | + 2 \, \binom{2 n - 1}{n} |
| 12 | + = \binom{2 n - 1}{n} + \binom{2 n - 1}{n - 1} |
| 13 | + \leq \, \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{2 n - 1} {\binom{2 n - 1}{k}} |
| 14 | + = \paren{1 + 1}^{2 n - 1} |
| 15 | + = 2 \cdot 4^{n - 1} |
| 16 | +\end{equation*} |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +Now, notice that it sufficies to prove the claimed statement for $x$ integer. |
| 19 | +For $x = 1$ and $x = 2$ it is immediate to verify its validity. |
| 20 | +Inductively, if $x > 2$ is even, then, trivially (using that $x$ is not a prime): |
| 21 | +\begin{equation*} |
| 22 | + \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{p \text{ prime}}}{1 \leq p \leq x}} {\mspace{-6mu} p} \mspace{6mu} |
| 23 | + = \mspace{-9mu} \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{p \text{ prime}}}{1 \leq p \leq x - 1}} {\mspace{-12mu} p} \mspace{3mu} |
| 24 | + \leq \mspace{1.2mu} 4^{x - 2} |
| 25 | + < 4^{x - 1} |
| 26 | +\end{equation*} |
| 27 | +If $x$ is odd, let $x = 2 m - 1$ for some integer $m > 1$; then: |
| 28 | +\begin{equation*} |
| 29 | + \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{p \text{ prime}}}{1 \leq p \leq x}} {\mspace{-6mu} p} \mspace{2mu} |
| 30 | + = \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{p \text{ prime}}}{1 \leq p \leq m}} {\mspace{-6mu} p} \mspace{2mu} |
| 31 | + \mspace{6mu} \cdot \mspace{-8mu} |
| 32 | + \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{p \text{ prime}}}{m < p < 2 m}} {\mspace{-10mu} p} \mspace{2mu} |
| 33 | + \leq \, 4^{m - 1} \cdot 4^{m - 1} |
| 34 | + = 4^{x - 1} |
| 35 | +\end{equation*} |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +% For $1 \leq x \leq 4$ the claim is trivially verified to hold true. |
| 39 | +% Inductively, if the claim holds for every $2^{k - 1} \leq y \leq 2^{k}$, then, |
| 40 | +% letting $2^{k} \leq x \leq 2^{k + 1}$ and denoting $t = \frac{\floor{x}}{2}$, |
| 41 | +% it holds that $2^{k - 1} \leq t \leq 2^{k}$, so: |
| 42 | +% \begin{equation*} |
| 43 | +% \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{\text{$p$ prime}}}{1 \leq p \leq x}} {\mspace{-8mu} p} \mspace{2mu} |
| 44 | +% \leq \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{\text{$p$ prime}}}{1 \leq p \leq \ceil{t}}} {\mspace{-8mu} p} |
| 45 | +% \mspace{4mu} \cdot \mspace{-4mu} |
| 46 | +% \prod\limits_{\underset{\scriptstyle{\text{$p$ prime}}}{\ceil{t} < p \leq 2 \ceil{t}}} {\mspace{-8mu} p} \mspace{2mu} |
| 47 | +% \leq \mspace{2mu} 4^{\ceil{t} - 1} \cdot 4^{\ceil{t} - 1} |
| 48 | +% = 4^{2 \ceil{t} - 2} |
| 49 | +% \leq 4^{x - 1} |
| 50 | +% \end{equation*} |
| 51 | +% having used that $2 \ceil{t} \geq \floor{x}$ and that $2 \ceil{t}$ itself is not prime, since $t > 1$. |
0 commit comments