Summary
Create a lightweight scorecard for evaluating content quality before and after publishing.
Why
The public repo should help people learn what strong positioning-based content looks like, not just help them produce more assets.
Scope
- define 5-8 quality dimensions
- include a simple scoring template
- separate message quality from vanity metrics
- include guidance for weekly review
Acceptance criteria
- scorecard is documented as a reusable template
- it is easy for a small team to use weekly
- it clearly supports the positioning -> execution workflow
Reference
- docs/roadmap.md#phase-3--evaluation-and-iteration-layer
Summary
Create a lightweight scorecard for evaluating content quality before and after publishing.
Why
The public repo should help people learn what strong positioning-based content looks like, not just help them produce more assets.
Scope
Acceptance criteria
Reference