Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

parent directory

..
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

README.md

Global Change Biology Skills

Global Change Biology cover

License: MIT Journal Field Claude Code

English | 简体中文

Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at Global Change Biology (GCB) — the leading journal on the impacts of global environmental change on biological systems, first published in 1995 and published by Wiley. GCB exists to advance understanding of the interface between global environmental change (climate warming, rising CO2 and tropospheric ozone, nitrogen deposition, land-use change, ocean change) and biological systems — at any level of organization from molecular to biome, in aquatic or terrestrial, managed or natural environments, including both biological responses and feedbacks to change.

This repository is opinionated. It is not a generic ecology writing toolbox, and it is deliberately distinct from a conservation-practice pack: GCB is about global-change mechanisms and ecosystem processes — the causal link between a driver of global change and a biological response — not conservation action plans or management prescriptions. A GCB paper leads with a mechanism of broad relevance, defends its scale and uncertainty, carries a graphical abstract of the driver-to-response link, and archives data and code with a DOI as a condition of publication.


What Is GCB, and Why a Dedicated Stack?

GCB's constraints differ from a regional ecology journal or a conservation journal:

Constraint GCB Implication
Scope Global environmental change × biological systems (molecular → biome) Need a global-change driver and a biological response/feedback
Premium on Mechanism + broad relevance, not local description A single-site result with no mechanism is off-fit
Distinct from Conservation practice (action/management) GCB wants mechanism/ecosystems, not conservation prescriptions
Publisher Wiley Submitted via ScholarOne / Manuscript Central, not Editorial Manager
Review model Editor-mediated expert review; live-check current anonymity/transparent-review options Pre-empt expert concerns and data-access requests
Length Research articles currently route to an up to 8,000-word main-body cap Confirm the current cap by article type before upload
Abstract 300-word limit; 6–10 keywords or phrases State aim, approach, quantified result, conclusion
Graphical abstract Required — depicts the driver-to-response mechanism Not a site map or phylogeny
Data & code Archived in a public repo with a DOI as a condition of publication "Available on request" is not accepted — deposit before publication

Volatile specifics (exact caps, accepted article types, fee/APC, policy wording, review model) change. resources/official-source-map.md now routes each operational fact to Wiley, ScholarOne, or a DOI-capable repository source; live-check the official Wiley pages in a browser immediately before upload.

Article types

  • Primary Research Articles — completed original studies with a global-change mechanism.
  • Technical Advances — new tools, methods, or modelling approaches for global-change biology.
  • Reviews / Research Reviews — integrative syntheses; GCB Reviews are by invitation, while the Research Reviews section is open for unsolicited submission.
  • Opinions / Perspectives — argued, forward-looking pieces; live-check the current word caps and eligibility before choosing this route.

Quick Start

Option A — Claude Code Plugin (recommended)

/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/gcb-skills
/plugin install gcb-skills
/reload-plugins

Option B — Manual Copy

git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/gcb-skills.git
cd gcb-skills

mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -R skills/gcb-* ~/.claude/skills/
# or
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && cp -R skills/gcb-* ~/.codex/skills/

First Prompt

Use gcb-workflow to tell me which skill I should use next for my Global Change Biology manuscript.

Default Workflow

gcb-topic-selection
        ▼
gcb-literature-positioning
        ▼
gcb-study-design
        ▼
gcb-data-analysis
        ▼
gcb-figures-and-tables
        ▼
gcb-reporting-and-data-policy
        ▼
gcb-writing-style           (polish)
        ▼
gcb-cover-letter
        ▼
gcb-review-process
        ▼
gcb-submission
        ▼
gcb-revision-and-rebuttal

gcb-workflow is the router — it tells you which skill to use next based on where you are and which article type fits. If your contribution is a method/tool, route to gcb-study-design as a Technical Advance; if it is a synthesis, route to gcb-literature-positioning for a Research Review (GCB Reviews are commissioned).


Skills

Skill Purpose
gcb-workflow Router — decides which sub-skill to invoke next; picks the article type
gcb-topic-selection Global-change fit test: driver → response, mechanism, broad relevance
gcb-literature-positioning Position across ecology/biogeochemistry/Earth-system literatures
gcb-study-design Experiments, gradients/observation, and modelling — scale, replication, realism
gcb-data-analysis Mixed models, meta-analysis, model evaluation, honest uncertainty
gcb-figures-and-tables Mechanism-first exhibits + the required graphical abstract
gcb-reporting-and-data-policy DOI data/code archiving; data availability statement; sensitive-data path
gcb-writing-style Mechanism + significance up front; quantified, accessible, within caps
gcb-cover-letter Editor-facing scope-fit + advance in a focused letter
gcb-review-process Desk screening, expert 2–3-reviewer review, decision categories
gcb-submission ScholarOne preflight (article type, abstract, graphical abstract, data)
gcb-revision-and-rebuttal Point-by-point response defending mechanism, scale, and uncertainty

Resources

  • resources/external_tools.md — global-change data sources (ERA5 / CMIP6 / FLUXNET / MODIS / GBIF / TRY) + R / Python / process-model and meta-analysis tooling, and DOI repositories (Dryad / Zenodo / PANGAEA)
  • resources/official-source-map.md — official Wiley / GCB URLs behind every fact, plus live-check notes for volatile items

What This Repo Does Not Do

  • It does not write a submittable manuscript for you
  • It does not simulate any specific editor's or reviewer's taste
  • It does not assert volatile metadata (exact caps, article types, fee/APC, policy wording, review model) without an official-source route; live-check those items on the official page before submission
  • It does not turn a conservation-management or local-description paper into a global-change mechanism — that is the researcher's science

Related


License

MIT