SKILL.md

name	advanced-functional-materials
description	Use when targeting Advanced Functional Materials (Adv. Funct. Mater.) or deciding whether a functional-materials manuscript fits this high-impact Wiley venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

Advanced Functional Materials (advanced-functional-materials)

Journal positioning

Advanced Functional Materials is a Wiley journal in the Advanced family and the functional-materials sister of Advanced Materials. Its defining character is primary research on materials whose value is defined by a function and an application: electronic, optoelectronic, photonic, magnetic, energy, biomedical, sensing, soft-robotic, and structural materials where the design of structure or composition delivers a specific, demonstrated capability. The journal rewards work that links materials design and mechanism to device-level or application-level performance, with the emphasis on the functional property rather than on a new bulk material per se. It is positioned just below Advanced Materials in scope breadth but shares its rigor and device orientation, expecting a clear structure-function-application chain. Readership spans materials chemistry, condensed-matter physics, device engineering, and applied nanoscience. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the Advanced Functional Materials Wiley site.

When to trigger

• The author names Advanced Functional Materials as the target for primary research on a functional material with a clear device or application emphasis.
• A manuscript demonstrates a functional property (electronic, optical, magnetic, mechanical, biomedical, sensing) enabled by materials design, and the author is choosing between this venue and Advanced Materials, Nature Materials, or Matter.
• A paper sits between a broadly significant materials breakthrough (Advanced Materials) and an application-specific result, and the author needs to decide where it fits.
• The author needs the journal's structure-function-application bar, house style, and desk-reject criteria before submission.

Scope & topic fit

• Electronic and optoelectronic materials and devices: semiconductors, transistors, LEDs, photodetectors, memristors, flexible and printed electronics where a materials advance drives device function.
• Energy-related functional materials with a device emphasis (storage, conversion, harvesting) where the functional property, not only the energy metric, is central.
• Photonic, plasmonic, and optical materials: metamaterials, light emitters, nonlinear and quantum-optical materials with demonstrated function.
• Magnetic, spintronic, and quantum materials where a designed structure yields a target functional response.
• Biomedical, bioelectronic, and biointerface materials: drug delivery, tissue scaffolds, biosensors, implantable and wearable devices.
• Soft, stimuli-responsive, sensing, and actuating materials: hydrogels, soft robotics, e-skin, and adaptive surfaces with quantified functional performance.

Method & evidence bar

• The functional property and its application context must be stated in one or two sentences; a paper that synthesizes a material without demonstrating and quantifying its function is misfit.
• The structure-function relationship must be established: characterization that connects composition/structure/processing to the measured functional property, not correlation alone.
• Functional and device performance must be quantified with conditions and uncertainty, and benchmarked against relevant state-of-the-art literature where a performance claim is made.
• Device or application demonstrations should follow field-appropriate testing protocols; stability, reproducibility across devices, and operating-condition robustness are expected for frontier claims.
• Mechanistic understanding of why the material delivers the function is expected; phenomenological performance alone is generally insufficient.
• Data and characterization supporting key claims should be available per Wiley/journal policy and reproducible from the reported parameters.

Structure & house style

• Advanced Functional Materials uses the Advanced-family format; Full Papers, Communications, and Reviews are typical article types — re-check current types and limits on the live site.
• The introduction concisely frames the functional gap and the application motivation; background is minimal because the readership is expert, and the advance is stated early.
• Figures must be efficient and quantitative: each carries a key structure-function or device-performance result, with comparisons that situate the work against the literature.
• A comprehensive Supporting Information carries full synthesis, characterization, device fabrication, and supplementary functional data.
• The Experimental Section must enable replication: synthesis, device/sample fabrication, measurement setups, and characterization parameters.
• Claims of superior function or performance must be supported by an explicit benchmark table or comparison to state of the art.

Official-submission checklist

• Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked.
• Search the live site for "Advanced Functional Materials author guidelines" and follow the current Wiley version.
• Re-check current article types, word/figure limits, and abstract format; confirm Experimental Section and Supporting Information conventions.
• Re-check data-availability and characterization-reporting requirements; confirm device-testing expectations for the relevant application area.
• Re-check competing-interests, funding, and AI-use disclosure requirements; confirm preprint policy (ChemRxiv/arXiv posting compatibility).
• If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

• One sentence — the functional property, the application it serves, and the materials design that enables it.
• The structure-function relationship is established with characterization, not inferred from performance alone.
• Functional/device performance is quantified with conditions, uncertainty, and a benchmark against the relevant literature.
• Device or application demonstrations follow field-appropriate protocols with stability and reproducibility evidence.
• Mechanistic understanding explains why the material delivers the function.
• The paper is positioned against recent Advanced Functional Materials / Advanced Materials / Nature Materials work in this area.

Common desk-reject triggers

• A materials synthesis paper with no demonstrated, quantified function or application relevance.
• A device or performance result with no structure-function understanding of why the material works.
• Functional performance reported without conditions or without comparison to relevant state-of-the-art literature.
• A frontier functional claim lacking reproducibility across devices or operating-condition robustness.
• Incremental property tuning with no mechanistic insight or application advance.

Re-routing decision

• A broadly significant, paradigm-shifting materials advance with wide cross-field impact: advanced-materials.
• A fundamental materials-science discovery emphasizing new physics/chemistry of the material itself: nature-materials.
• An application-driven materials-for-impact study (energy, sustainability, devices) with a systems framing: matter.
• If the functional advance is energy-specific with device/system metrics central: an energy-materials venue (advanced-energy-materials).

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Advanced Functional Materials
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics>
[Method/evidence] <is there a clear structure-function-application chain with quantified, benchmarked performance and mechanism?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article types/limits / device-testing protocols / data-availability / disclosure / preprint policy>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>