Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

parent directory

..
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

README.md

Conservation Biology Skills

Conservation Biology cover

License: MIT Journal Field Claude Code

English | 简体中文

Agent skill stack for manuscripts targeted at Conservation Biology — the flagship journal of the Society for Conservation Biology (SCB), founded in 1987 and published by Wiley. Conservation Biology publishes ground-breaking research, essays, and reviews that develop theory and methods, define key problems, and propose solutions across the social, ecological, and philosophical dimensions of conserving biological diversity — population and landscape ecology, extinction risk, protected-area design, human-wildlife interactions, and conservation policy and practice, drawing on both the natural and social sciences.

This repository is opinionated. It is not a generic ecology writing toolbox and it is not an economics or methods pack repurposed for conservation. It is a Conservation Biology-specific stack: a result with direct, transferable implications for conserving biodiversity, a design matched to the ecological question (detection, scale, counterfactuals), double-blind preparation, a data availability statement with shareable data/code archived where possible, and conservation recommendations that bridge science and practice without over-claiming.


What Is Conservation Biology, and Why a Dedicated Stack?

Conservation Biology's constraints differ from a general ecology journal or a methods journal:

Constraint Conservation Biology Implication
Premium on Direct conservation relevance + novelty + transferability A sound but inconsequential study is off-fit
Scope Conserving biological diversity — ecology + practice + policy The result must inform a real conservation decision
Methods Field ecology, modeling, synthesis, human dimensions — judged on own terms Match design to the question; don't force one template
Publisher / owner Wiley / Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) Submit via ScholarOne Manuscript Central, not Editorial Manager
Review model Double-blind (adopted 2014) Anonymize manuscript and author identities
Length Contributed Papers 7,000 in current Wiley listings; abstract ≤ 300 Word count runs Abstract → Literature Cited (excludes tables)
Exhibits About one table/figure per four pages of text Every exhibit must earn its space; rest goes to SI
Transparency Data-availability statement; shareable data/code deposit encouraged Build the package as you go; protect sensitive species data
Sensitive data Mask precise locations of threatened / trafficked taxa A map must not aid poaching or disturbance

Use resources/official-source-map.md for the source trail behind these claims. The final upload-week check belongs on the live Wiley Instructions for Authors page, especially for article-type availability, caps beyond Contributed Papers, declarations, and production file prompts.

Main article types

  • Contributed Papers — full empirical study, IMRAD, broad relevance (current Wiley listings show 7,000 words).
  • Research Notes — focused or preliminary contributions.
  • Reviews — comprehensive synthesis of a well-developed literature.
  • Essays — forward-looking, evidence-grounded arguments on conservation issues.
  • Conservation Practice and Policy — applied tools, policy, and management lessons.
  • Comments / Diversity / Letters — short formats (no abstract). Registered Reports where offered.

Quick Start

Option A — Claude Code Plugin (recommended)

/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/conbio-skills
/plugin install conbio-skills
/reload-plugins

Option B — Manual Copy

git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/conbio-skills.git
cd conbio-skills

mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -R skills/conbio-* ~/.claude/skills/
# or
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills && cp -R skills/conbio-* ~/.codex/skills/

First Prompt

Use conbio-workflow to tell me which skill I should use next for my Conservation Biology manuscript.

Default Workflow

conbio-topic-selection
        ▼
conbio-literature-positioning
        ▼
conbio-study-design
        ▼
conbio-data-analysis
        ▼
conbio-figures-and-tables
        ▼
conbio-reporting-and-data-policy
        ▼
conbio-writing-style          (polish)
        ▼
conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications
        ▼
conbio-review-process
        ▼
conbio-submission
        ▼
conbio-revision-and-rebuttal

conbio-workflow is the router — it tells you which skill to use next based on where you are. If your design is prospective, route to conbio-review-process early to consider the Registered Reports track; most papers loop design ↔ analysis ↔ conservation relevance before final writing.


Skills

Skill Purpose
conbio-workflow Router — decides which sub-skill to invoke next
conbio-topic-selection Conservation-relevance fit; novelty + transferability; pick the article type
conbio-literature-positioning Engage the conservation literatures; state the gap precisely
conbio-study-design Defend the design — detection, scale, counterfactuals, modeling, synthesis
conbio-data-analysis Appropriate models, honest uncertainty, robustness, reproducibility
conbio-figures-and-tables Self-contained, accessible exhibits and maps; mask sensitive locations
conbio-reporting-and-data-policy Data-availability statement + shareable data/code archive; restricted data
conbio-writing-style Journal Style Guide; accessible prose within the per-type word cap
conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications Sharpen the so-what; actionable, transferable recommendations
conbio-review-process Double-blind review, editorial screening, decision categories, Registered Reports
conbio-submission ScholarOne preflight (anonymization, caps, Style Guide, data statement)
conbio-revision-and-rebuttal Response-letter strategy for multiple reviewers + handling editor

Resources

  • resources/external_tools.md — conservation data sources (GBIF / IUCN Red List / WDPA / Movebank / Global Forest Watch) + R / Python / GIS and synthesis tooling
  • resources/official-source-map.md — official Wiley / SCB URLs behind every journal-specific fact and upload-week live-check boundary

What This Repo Does Not Do

  • It does not write a submittable manuscript for you
  • It does not simulate any specific editor's or reviewer's taste
  • It does not freeze upload-week metadata such as article-type availability, all per-type caps, file prompts, or masthead details; check the official page before submission
  • It does not decide whether your result has genuine conservation relevance — that is the researcher's call

Related


License

MIT