English | 简体中文
An opinionated agent skill stack for 30 flagship English-language specialty clinical-medicine journals — deepening the clinical-medicine category beyond the general big-four (NEJM, Lancet, JAMA, BMJ) and the broad-specialty venues already covered by the natural-science bundle. It covers the JAMA Network specialty journals (Internal Medicine, Oncology, Cardiology, Neurology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Surgery), the Lancet specialty titles (Respiratory Medicine, Diabetes & Endocrinology, Public Health, Psychiatry), and the leading society/specialty flagships across oncology, respiratory/critical care, nephrology, endocrinology, hepatology/GI, allergy/immunology, rheumatology, neurology, radiology, anesthesiology, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology.
This is the specialty-clinical sibling of English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills (which holds the general big-four and broad-specialty clinical flagships). Like the other bundles, it ships one self-contained fit-and-house-style skill per journal, plus en-clinmed-journal-workflow for routing. Each journal skill helps answer: is my study on-target for this specialty venue, how should it be framed, what clinical evidence and reporting standard does it expect, and what official submission details (article type, reporting checklist, trial registration, ethics, disclosures) must be re-checked?
These skills are venue-fit and house-style aids only. They are not clinical, diagnostic, or regulatory advice.
| Group | Count |
|---|---|
| JAMA Network specialty journals | 7 |
| The Lancet specialty titles | 4 |
| Oncology · respiratory/critical care · nephrology · endocrinology | 8 |
| Hepatology/GI · allergy/immunology · rheumatology · neurology | 6 |
| Radiology · anesthesiology · ob-gyn · urology | 5 |
| Total journal skills | 30 |
Routing workflow (en-clinmed-journal-workflow) |
1 |
- Route first. Start from
en-clinmed-journal-workflowto classify your study by specialty, study design (RCT / observational / diagnostic-accuracy / review), and evidence strength, and get a ranked shortlist of candidate venues. - Fit second. Open the single-journal skill for your top candidate to test scope fit, framing, the clinical-evidence bar, house style, and likely desk-reject triggers.
- Re-check official rules last. Every skill ends with an official-submission
checklist. Before submitting, open the journal's current instructions for authors
(see
resources/official-source-map.md), confirm the applicable reporting guideline (CONSORT/PRISMA/STROBE/STARD) and trial registration — the live page always wins.
- No volatile facts. No impact factors, acceptance rates, ISSNs, exact limits, APC amounts, or editor names.
- No fabricated citations. Literatures are referred to generically.
- No clinical advice. These are venue-fit and house-style tools.
- Stable conventions only. Durable structural facts (structured abstracts, the evidence hierarchy, ICMJE trial-registration and authorship rules, the EQUATOR reporting guidelines, society affiliations) are used where they help fit.
- Official page wins. If a live instruction conflicts with a skill, follow the official instruction.
MIT © 2026 Bryce Wang. See LICENSE.