A structural template for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) article. ASQ publishes both qualitative/inductive and quantitative work; two parallel skeletons are given. Adapt to the live Manuscript Submission Guidelines (verify limits and formatting on the official page). Theory is foregrounded throughout; the paper should read as a compelling intellectual story.
Title Author name(s), affiliation(s), contact Acknowledgments, funding, prior-version notes Corresponding author
- One paragraph within the journal's stated limit
- Shape: puzzle → setting → core insight (surprise) → contribution
- Keywords
- Open with the puzzle/anomaly (make the reader curious and slightly uncomfortable)
- Why existing organization theory cannot explain it
- The conversation you join + your contribution claim (one sharp paragraph)
- Brief preview of setting, approach, and the surprising insight
- The conversation, steelmanned
- The tension/opening your study addresses
- Sensitizing concepts (without over-determining the inductive analysis)
- Research setting and why it is theoretically apt
- Theoretical sampling logic (cases/sites/informants)
- Data sources: interviews (count, roles, timing), observation, archival/documents
- Data analysis: coding process (first-order → second-order → aggregate dimensions), who coded, iteration, negative-case analysis
- Trustworthiness: credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability; reflexivity
- Organized by the emergent theoretical structure (not chronology of fieldwork)
- Power quotes in the body; proof quotes in the data-to-theory table
- Build toward the process/theory model
- Lead with the theoretical contribution (reframing / mechanism / boundary / new model)
- The process model figure and its logic
- Boundary conditions and limitations
- Generativity: the new questions opened
- Brief, genuine practical implications (optional)
- Figure: data structure (first-order → second-order → dimensions)
- Figure: process/theory model
- Table: data-to-theory / representative evidence (proof quotes)
- Table: case/site comparison (if multiple cases)
- Puzzle/anomaly and why prior theory predicts otherwise
- Conversation joined + contribution claim (one sharp paragraph)
- Core mechanism (actors + structure + causal logic)
- Each hypothesis with its own derivation paragraph tied to the mechanism
- Theoretically motivated moderators/mediators (no fishing)
- Sample, unit of analysis, time frame, and why they fit the theory
- Measures: operationalization, validity, reliability; common-method remedies if same-source
- Model and identification strategy (panel FE, event-history, multilevel, IV/natural experiment)
- Multilevel structure justified if cross-level
- Descriptives and correlations
- Main models built cumulatively (baseline → controls → focal → interactions)
- Interaction plots; effect magnitudes interpreted in organizational terms
- Mechanism evidence; robustness targeting the theory's threats
- Lead with the contribution, not a findings recap
- Boundary conditions, limits, alternative explanations addressed
- Generativity: new questions and directions
- Table: descriptives + correlations
- Table: main regression models (cumulative)
- Figure: interaction/marginal-effects plots
- Appendix/online supplement: robustness, additional measures
- ASQ/SAGE author–date style; full reference list
- Recent + canonical organization-theory works both engaged
- Qualitative: interview guide, extended quotes, coding detail
- Quantitative: robustness tables, alternative specifications, variable construction