Speed of export when running --update #1239
-
|
Hello - just started using the tool. Did an initial export and everything worked great (for about 500 GB of media). I then exported again a few days later and noticed that the tool evaluates every photo and sidecar file. I have the verbose logs enabled, and saw each photo being evaluated. Now, each photo was then reported as 'Skipped up to date file' so nothing was actually copied. However, I assumed that subsequent exports after the initial one would have been much faster, but in this case, because each photo is still evaluated, it took roughly the same amount of time. Is that expected behavior? It's not a big ideal if it is as my syncs will run overnight anyways, but I would like to know if I'm doing something wrong. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
|
Hi @chrismanderson welcome to osxphotos. The answer is "it depends". If on an internal SSD drive, the update will be much faster. If on a NAS or slower external drive, it may take the same amount of time. Depending on the options you used for export, here's what osxphotos evaluates when doing an update:
If you are exporting to a NAS or external drive, I suggest using the I've made a couple attempts to improve export speed with multi-threading, etc. however this greatly complicates the code and it's not something I need so I do not spend a lot of time worrying about the export speed. As you said, for repeat use, just let it run overnight. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the information! I am backing up to a NAS, and the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @chrismanderson welcome to osxphotos. The answer is "it depends". If on an internal SSD drive, the update will be much faster. If on a NAS or slower external drive, it may take the same amount of time. Depending on the options you used for export, here's what osxphotos evaluates when doing an update:
/your/export/path/…