Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
1146 lines (853 loc) · 41.2 KB

File metadata and controls

1146 lines (853 loc) · 41.2 KB

QAtrial Regulatory Reference

Reference guide for the regulatory standards and frameworks used in QAtrial's templates.


Table of Contents

  1. By Country
  2. By Vertical
  3. Module Standards
  4. Compliance Starter Packs
  5. Validation Package
  6. Compliance Improvements

1. By Country

United States (US)

Regulatory Authority: FDA (Food and Drug Administration)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • 21 CFR Part 11 -- Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
  • 21 CFR Parts 210/211 -- Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) for drugs
  • 21 CFR Part 820 -- Quality System Regulation (QSR) / QMSR for medical devices
  • 21 CFR Parts 600-680 -- Biologics regulations
  • 21 CFR Part 58 -- Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)
  • 21 CFR Parts 50/56 -- IRB and Informed Consent

Notable Requirements:

  • Electronic records must have audit trails per 11.10(e)
  • Electronic signatures require re-authentication per 11.200(a)
  • Computer system validation following GAMP 5 framework
  • Data integrity per ALCOA+ principles (FDA guidance)
  • 510(k) and PMA submission pathways for medical devices

European Union (EU) -- Base Templates

Regulatory Framework: EU-wide GMP, MDR, IVDR

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • EU Annex 11 -- Computerised Systems
  • EU GMP (EudraLex Volume 4) -- Good Manufacturing Practice
  • EU MDR 2017/745 -- Medical Device Regulation
  • EU IVDR 2017/746 -- In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation
  • EU CTR 536/2014 -- Clinical Trials Regulation
  • EU Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009
  • REACH (EC 1907/2006) -- Chemical safety
  • CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008) -- Classification and labelling

Notable Requirements:

  • Annex 11 Section 9: Audit trail requirement for GMP-critical data
  • Data integrity per EMA guidance on computerised systems
  • EU MDR requires clinical evaluation and post-market surveillance
  • EU base templates are loaded first for all EU/EFTA country projects

Germany (DE)

Regulatory Authority: BfArM (Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices), PEI (Paul Ehrlich Institute for biologics)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • AMWHV (Arzneimittel- und Wirkstoffherstellungsverordnung) -- German GMP
  • MPG/MDR implementation -- Medical device regulations
  • EU Annex 11 (applied through German implementation)
  • GAMP 5 (widely adopted in German pharma industry)
  • ISO 13485 -- QMS for medical devices

Notable Requirements:

  • German GMP requirements are layered on top of EU GMP base
  • BfArM-specific CSV expectations for pharmaceutical systems
  • Strong emphasis on qualification and validation documentation (DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ)
  • German language documentation may be required for domestic regulatory submissions

United Kingdom (GB)

Regulatory Authority: MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • MHRA Data Integrity Guidance (March 2018)
  • UK GMP (derived from EU GMP, post-Brexit adaptations)
  • MHRA GxP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance
  • GAMP 5 (2nd Edition)
  • EU Annex 11 (adopted into UK law)

Notable Requirements:

  • MHRA places strong emphasis on data integrity and ALCOA+ principles
  • Post-Brexit, UK has its own device regulation (UKCA marking)
  • CSV expectations align with GAMP 5 risk-based approach
  • MHRA guidance on cloud and SaaS system validation

France (FR)

Regulatory Authority: ANSM (Agence nationale de securite du medicament et des produits de sante)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • Bonnes Pratiques de Fabrication (BPF) -- French GMP
  • ANSM guidelines on computerised systems
  • EU Annex 11 (French implementation)
  • ISO 13485 for medical devices
  • French Bioethics Law requirements for clinical research

Notable Requirements:

  • French GMP (BPF) aligns with EU GMP with ANSM-specific interpretations
  • CNIL (data protection authority) requirements for patient data
  • French-language documentation requirements for domestic submissions
  • ANSM inspection focus areas for computerised systems

Japan (JP)

Regulatory Authority: PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency), MHLW (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • GMP Ministerial Ordinance (Japan GMP)
  • PMDA ER/ES Guidance -- Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures
  • PIC/S GMP Guidelines (Japan is a PIC/S member)
  • PMDA CSV Guidelines
  • J-GCP (Japanese Good Clinical Practice)

Notable Requirements:

  • PMDA ER/ES guidance is the Japanese equivalent of 21 CFR Part 11
  • STED (Summary Technical Documentation) format for medical device submissions
  • Japanese-language documentation requirements
  • Emphasis on data reliability and traceability in PMDA inspections
  • PIC/S alignment for pharmaceutical manufacturing

China (CN)

Regulatory Authority: NMPA (National Medical Products Administration, formerly CFDA)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • NMPA Medical Device Registration Regulations
  • Chinese GMP (2010 Revision)
  • GB/T 42061-2022 (equivalent to ISO 13485)
  • NMPA Data Integrity Requirements
  • Chinese Pharmacopoeia requirements

Notable Requirements:

  • NMPA registration process for medical devices (Class I/II/III)
  • Chinese GMP has unique requirements beyond EU/US GMP
  • GB/T standards are Chinese national equivalents of ISO standards
  • Data localization requirements for clinical trial data
  • Chinese-language documentation mandatory for domestic registration

South Korea (KR)

Regulatory Authority: MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • KGMP (Korean Good Manufacturing Practice)
  • MFDS Medical Device Regulations
  • PIC/S GMP Guidelines (Korea is a PIC/S member)
  • ICH Q7 requirements (adopted by MFDS)
  • Korean Pharmaceutical Affairs Act

Notable Requirements:

  • KGMP closely follows PIC/S guidelines with Korean-specific additions
  • MFDS has its own device classification system
  • Korean-language documentation requirements
  • Emphasis on process validation and cleaning validation
  • KGMP inspection focus on computerised system controls

India (IN)

Regulatory Authority: CDSCO (Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • Schedule M (Indian GMP)
  • CDSCO Guidelines on Computerised Systems
  • WHO TRS Guidelines (India follows WHO guidance extensively)
  • Indian Pharmacopoeia requirements
  • Medical Device Rules 2017

Notable Requirements:

  • Schedule M defines Indian GMP requirements (revised 2018)
  • WHO guidance is heavily referenced for pharmaceutical manufacturing
  • CDSCO inspection procedures for computerised systems
  • Data integrity requirements aligned with WHO and PIC/S guidance
  • Growing emphasis on CSV and electronic records

Canada (CA)

Regulatory Authority: Health Canada

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • CMDR (Canadian Medical Devices Regulations)
  • Health Canada GMP Guidelines (GUI-0001)
  • ISO 13485:2016 (mandatory for medical device QMS)
  • ISO 14971 (risk management for medical devices)
  • Health Canada CSV Guidance

Notable Requirements:

  • Health Canada aligns closely with FDA and EU approaches
  • CMDR requires ISO 13485 compliance for medical devices
  • Risk-based approach to CSV following GAMP 5
  • Bilingual (English/French) documentation may be required
  • MDEL (Medical Device Establishment Licence) requirements

Mexico (MX)

Regulatory Authority: COFEPRIS (Comision Federal para la Proteccion contra Riesgos Sanitarios)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • NOM-059-SSA1-2015 -- Good Manufacturing Practices
  • NOM-241-SSA1-2012 -- GMP for Medical Devices
  • COFEPRIS guidelines on pharmaceutical manufacturing
  • PIC/S GMP alignment (Mexico is working toward PIC/S membership)

Notable Requirements:

  • NOM-059 is the primary Mexican GMP standard
  • COFEPRIS inspection procedures for manufacturing sites
  • Clean room qualification per NOM-059 requirements
  • Spanish-language documentation mandatory
  • Growing alignment with international GMP standards

Italy (IT)

Regulatory Authority: AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • Italian implementation of EU GMP (Norme di Buona Fabbricazione)
  • AIFA guidelines on pharmaceutical manufacturing
  • EU Annex 11 (Italian implementation)
  • EU MDR 2017/745 (Italian implementation)
  • EMA guidelines

Notable Requirements:

  • AIFA enforces EU GMP through Italian national legislation
  • Strong pharmaceutical manufacturing sector with AIFA inspection focus
  • Italian-language documentation for domestic submissions
  • EU GMP Annex 1 compliance for sterile manufacturing
  • Integration with European Medicines Regulatory Network

Spain (ES)

Regulatory Authority: AEMPS (Agencia Espanola de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • Spanish implementation of EU GMP (Buenas Practicas de Fabricacion)
  • AEMPS Good Clinical Practice guidelines
  • EU CTR 536/2014 (Spanish implementation via CTIS)
  • EU MDR 2017/745 (Spanish implementation)

Notable Requirements:

  • AEMPS oversight of clinical trials per EU Clinical Trials Regulation
  • Spanish implementation of CTIS (Clinical Trials Information System)
  • Spanish-language documentation requirements
  • Strong CRO sector requiring GCP compliance
  • Integration with European clinical trial network

Netherlands (NL)

Regulatory Authority: IGJ (Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd), CCMO (Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects)

Primary Standards Referenced in Templates:

  • Dutch implementation of EU GMP
  • RvA (Raad voor Accreditatie) requirements for clinical laboratories
  • ISO 15189:2022 for medical laboratories
  • EU MDR 2017/745 (Dutch implementation)
  • ISO 17025 for testing and calibration laboratories

Notable Requirements:

  • Strong clinical laboratory sector with RvA accreditation
  • ISO 15189 is the primary standard for diagnostic laboratories
  • Measurement uncertainty analysis requirements
  • Dutch-language documentation for laboratory accreditation
  • Integration with European Medicines Agency (EMA headquarters in Amsterdam)

2. By Vertical

Pharmaceuticals (pharma)

Risk Taxonomy: ICH Q9 (Quality Risk Management)

Key GxP Standards:

  • GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice)
  • GCP (Good Clinical Practice)
  • GLP (Good Laboratory Practice)
  • GDP (Good Distribution Practice)
  • GVP (Good Pharmacovigilance Practice)
  • GDocP (Good Documentation Practice)

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
ICH Q7 GMP for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System
21 CFR Parts 210/211 US cGMP for finished pharmaceuticals
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic records and signatures
EU Annex 11 Computerised systems
GAMP 5 (2nd Edition) CSV framework

Biotechnology (biotech)

Risk Taxonomy: ICH Q9

Key GxP Standards:

  • GMP (Biologics-specific)
  • GCP
  • GLP

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
ICH Q5A-Q5E Quality of biotechnological products
ICH Q8 Pharmaceutical development
ICH Q11 Development and manufacture of drug substances
21 CFR Parts 600-680 US biologics regulations
EU Annex 11 Computerised systems
GAMP 5 CSV framework

Medical Devices (medical_devices)

Risk Taxonomy: ISO 14971 (Risk Management for Medical Devices)

Safety Classification: FDA Class I / II / III

Key GxP Standards:

  • QMSR / QSR
  • ISO 13485 (QMS)
  • IEC 62304 (Software Lifecycle)
  • ISO 14971 (Risk Management)

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
ISO 13485 Quality Management Systems for Medical Devices
ISO 14971 Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices
21 CFR 820 Quality System Regulation (transitioning to QMSR)
EU MDR 2017/745 European Medical Device Regulation
IEC 62304 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes
IEC 62366 Usability Engineering for Medical Devices

Clinical Research / CRO (cro)

Risk Taxonomy: ICH Q9

Safety Classification: GCP Critical / Non-Critical

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic records and signatures
21 CFR Parts 50/56 IRB and informed consent
EU CTR 536/2014 European Clinical Trials Regulation
GAMP 5 CSV framework
ALCOA+ Data integrity principles

Clinical Laboratories (clinical_lab)

Risk Taxonomy: FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis)

Safety Classification: High Complexity / Moderate / Waived

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
CLIA 88 (42 CFR 493) Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments
CAP Accreditation Checklist College of American Pathologists
ISO 15189 Medical Laboratories -- Requirements for Quality and Competence
ISO 17025 Testing and Calibration Laboratories
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic records
GLP (21 CFR Part 58) Good Laboratory Practice

Logistics / GDP / GSP (logistics)

Risk Taxonomy: FMEA

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
EU GDP Guidelines (2013/C 343/01) European Good Distribution Practice
WHO TRS 957 Annex 5 WHO GDP guidance
21 CFR Part 211.150 US distribution requirements
USP <1079> Good Storage Practice
DSCSA Drug Supply Chain Security Act
ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems

Software and IT / GAMP/CSV (software_it)

Risk Taxonomy: GAMP 5

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
GAMP 5 (2nd Edition) Good Automated Manufacturing Practice
ISO 27001 Information Security Management System
SOC 2 Type II Service Organization Controls
OWASP Top 10 Web application security
NIST CSF Cybersecurity Framework
IEC 62304 Medical device software (where applicable)

Cosmetics / Chemical / Environmental (cosmetics)

Risk Taxonomy: Generic

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
EU Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 EU cosmetics safety
FDA FD&C Act US cosmetics regulation
ISO 22716 GMP for Cosmetics
REACH (EC 1907/2006) Chemical safety registration
MoCRA Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act (US)
ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems

Aerospace (aerospace)

Risk Taxonomy: FMEA

Safety Classification: DAL A-E (DO-178C)

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
AS9100D QMS for Aviation, Space, and Defense
DO-178C Software Considerations in Airborne Systems
DO-254 Design Assurance for Airborne Electronic Hardware
EASA Part 21 European Aviation Safety Agency certification
FAR Part 21 FAA type and production certification
NADCAP National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation

Chemical / Environmental (chemical_env)

Risk Taxonomy: FMEA

Primary Regulatory References in Templates:

Standard Description
REACH (EC 1907/2006) Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation of Chemicals
CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008) Classification, Labelling, Packaging
TSCA US Toxic Substances Control Act
ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems
ISO 45001 Occupational Health and Safety
GHS Globally Harmonized System of Classification

3. Module Standards

Audit Trail

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR Part 11.10(e) -- Electronic records must maintain audit trails
  • EU Annex 11 Section 9 -- Audit trail for GMP-critical data changes
  • FDA Data Integrity Guidance
  • MHRA Data Integrity Guidance
  • PIC/S PI 011 (GMP Computerised Systems)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Every CRUD operation on GxP records must be logged
  • Before/after values must be captured for modifications
  • Timestamps must be from a trusted, NTP-synchronized source
  • Audit trail must be tamper-resistant (append-only, hash chaining)
  • User identity must be captured for every entry
  • Audit trail must be readily available for review (no "hiding" behind queries)

Electronic Signatures

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR Part 11 Subparts B and C
  • EU Annex 11 Section 14
  • PMDA ER/ES Guidance (Japan)
  • Health Canada Part 11 equivalent guidance

Key Compliance Points:

  • Each signature must be linked to a unique individual (11.100)
  • Signature manifestation: name, date/time, meaning (11.50)
  • Re-authentication required at point of signing (11.200)
  • Non-repudiation: signer cannot deny having signed (11.70)
  • Signature/record binding must survive export and archival

Data Integrity (ALCOA+)

Regulations That Require It:

  • FDA Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP (2018)
  • MHRA GxP Data Integrity Guidance (2018)
  • WHO Technical Report Series No. 996 Annex 5
  • PIC/S PI 041 (Good Practices for Data Management)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Attributable: Who performed the action and when
  • Legible: Data is readable and permanent
  • Contemporaneous: Recorded at the time of activity
  • Original: First recording of the data (or certified copy)
  • Accurate: No errors or editing without documentation
  • +Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available

Change Control

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 211.100 (Written procedures for production and process control)
  • EU GMP Chapter 1 (Pharmaceutical Quality System)
  • ISO 13485 Section 7.3.9 (Design and development changes)
  • ICH Q10 (Pharmaceutical Quality System)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Formal change request documentation
  • Impact assessment before implementation
  • Approval workflow with defined authority levels
  • Change classification (major/minor)
  • Effectiveness verification post-implementation
  • Strict verticals (pharma, medical devices, biotech) require 2+ approvers

CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Actions)

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 820.90 (Medical device CAPA)
  • EU GMP Chapter 1.4 (Quality risk management)
  • ISO 13485 Section 8.5.2/8.5.3
  • ICH Q10 Section 3.2

Key Compliance Points:

  • Root cause analysis methodology
  • Corrective action to address the immediate problem
  • Preventive action to prevent recurrence
  • Effectiveness verification with defined criteria
  • Trending and escalation for systemic issues
  • CAPA closure requires documented evidence of effectiveness

Deviation Management

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 211.192 (Production record review -- investigation of discrepancies)
  • EU GMP Chapter 1.4 (Deviation handling)
  • ISO 13485 Section 8.3 (Control of nonconforming product)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Deviation recording with classification (critical/major/minor)
  • Investigation with root cause determination
  • Impact assessment on product quality and patient safety
  • Extension to CAPA when systemic issues identified
  • Trending of deviations for quality improvement

Training Management

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 211.25 (Personnel qualifications)
  • EU GMP Chapter 2 (Personnel)
  • ISO 13485 Section 6.2 (Human resources)
  • 21 CFR 820.25 (Medical device personnel)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Training plans aligned to job functions
  • Competency assessment and documentation
  • Training effectiveness verification
  • Retraining requirements for changes
  • Training records accessible for inspection

Supplier Qualification

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 211.84 (Testing and approval of components)
  • EU GMP Chapter 5 (Production -- starting materials)
  • ISO 13485 Section 7.4 (Purchasing)
  • ICH Q7 Section 7 (Contract manufacturing)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Supplier assessment and qualification criteria
  • Supplier auditing program
  • Approved supplier list management
  • Quality agreements
  • Ongoing performance monitoring and review

Complaint Handling

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 820.198 (Medical device complaint handling)
  • 21 CFR 211.198 (Drug product complaint files)
  • EU MDR Article 87-92 (Vigilance)
  • ISO 13485 Section 8.2.2 (Complaint handling)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Complaint intake and classification
  • Investigation procedures
  • Trending and signal detection
  • Regulatory reporting (MDR, MedWatch, MAUDE)
  • Closure with documented rationale

Risk Management

Regulations That Require It:

  • ISO 14971 (Medical devices)
  • ICH Q9 (Pharmaceutical quality risk management)
  • EU MDR 2017/745 Annex I (General safety and performance requirements)
  • 21 CFR 820.30(g) (Design validation including risk analysis)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Hazard identification
  • Risk estimation (severity, probability, detectability)
  • Risk evaluation against acceptability criteria
  • Risk control measures
  • Residual risk assessment
  • Risk management report

Document Control

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 820.40 (Document controls)
  • EU GMP Chapter 4 (Documentation)
  • ISO 13485 Section 4.2.4/4.2.5
  • 21 CFR 211.186-188 (Master and batch production records)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Version control with revision history
  • Review and approval before issuance
  • Controlled distribution (ensure only current versions in use)
  • Obsolete document management
  • Document change control integration

Backup and Disaster Recovery

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR Part 11.10(c) (Protection of records)
  • EU Annex 11 Section 7.1 (Data storage and backup)
  • ISO 27001 Annex A.12.3 (Backup)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Defined backup schedule and retention policy
  • Regular restore testing with documented results
  • Business continuity plan for system failure
  • Off-site or cloud backup for disaster scenarios
  • Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) defined

Access Control / Segregation of Duties

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR 11.10(d) (Limiting system access)
  • EU Annex 11 Section 12 (Security)
  • ISO 27001 Annex A.9 (Access control)
  • 21 CFR 211.68 (Automatic data processing systems)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Role-based access control (RBAC)
  • Unique user credentials (no shared accounts)
  • Segregation of duties (author vs. approver)
  • Periodic access reviews
  • Account lifecycle management (onboarding, offboarding)

Validation / CSV

Regulations That Require It:

  • 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic records systems)
  • EU Annex 11 (Computerised systems)
  • GAMP 5 (2nd Edition)
  • PIC/S PI 011

Key Compliance Points:

  • User Requirements Specification (URS)
  • Functional Specification (FS)
  • Design Specification (DS)
  • Installation Qualification (IQ)
  • Operational Qualification (OQ)
  • Performance Qualification (PQ)
  • Validation Summary Report (VSR)
  • Traceability Matrix (URS to test evidence)

Traceability Matrix

Regulations That Require It:

  • IEC 62304 Section 5.7 (Software verification -- traceability)
  • ISO 13485 Section 7.3.8 (Design transfer)
  • GAMP 5 (requirement traceability)
  • 21 CFR 820.30 (Design controls -- design verification)

Key Compliance Points:

  • Full bidirectional traceability (requirement to test, test to requirement)
  • Coverage analysis (no orphaned requirements)
  • Gap identification (requirements without tests)
  • Design input to design output mapping
  • Verification and validation evidence linking

4. Compliance Starter Packs

QAtrial provides 4 pre-configured compliance starter packs that bundle a regulatory framework into a one-click wizard setup:

FDA Software Validation (GAMP 5)

Attribute Value
Target Audience Software/IT teams validating systems under FDA oversight
Country US
Vertical Software and IT (GAMP/CSV)
Project Type Validation
Modules Audit Trail, Electronic Signatures, Data Integrity, Change Control, Validation/CSV, Access Control, Document Control
Key Standards 21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11, GAMP 5 2nd Edition

Use case: Validating a computerised system (LIMS, ERP, MES, QMS) per FDA expectations. Generates requirements covering Part 11 electronic records, GAMP 5 Category 4/5 validation, audit trail, and access control.


EU MDR Medical Device QMS

Attribute Value
Target Audience Medical device manufacturers establishing or maintaining QMS
Country DE (EU base templates also loaded)
Vertical Medical Devices
Project Type Quality System
Modules Audit Trail, Electronic Signatures, Risk Management, CAPA, Deviation Management, Supplier Qualification, Complaint Handling, Document Control, Training
Key Standards ISO 13485, ISO 14971, EU MDR 2017/745, IEC 62304, IEC 62366

Use case: Setting up a quality management system for CE-marked medical devices. Generates requirements for design controls, risk management (ISO 14971), post-market surveillance, and full QMS lifecycle.


FDA GMP Pharmaceutical Quality

Attribute Value
Target Audience Pharmaceutical manufacturers establishing cGMP compliance
Country US
Vertical Pharmaceuticals
Project Type Quality System
Modules Audit Trail, Electronic Signatures, Data Integrity, Change Control, CAPA, Deviation Management, Training, Supplier Qualification, Document Control, Validation/CSV
Key Standards 21 CFR 210/211, ICH Q7, ICH Q10, 21 CFR Part 11, GAMP 5

Use case: Establishing a pharmaceutical quality system meeting FDA cGMP expectations. Covers production controls, laboratory controls, packaging and labeling, CAPA, and supplier qualification.


ISO 27001 + GDPR Compliance

Attribute Value
Target Audience IT/software teams establishing information security and privacy compliance
Country DE (EU base templates also loaded)
Vertical Software and IT (GAMP/CSV)
Project Type Compliance
Modules Audit Trail, Access Control, Data Integrity, Change Control, Risk Management, Document Control, Backup and Disaster Recovery
Key Standards ISO 27001, GDPR (EU 2016/679), SOC 2, NIST CSF

Use case: Achieving ISO 27001 certification and GDPR compliance. Generates requirements for information security controls, privacy impact assessments, data processing records, incident response, and business continuity.


5. Validation Package

QAtrial includes a complete validation documentation package in docs/validation/ suitable for regulatory inspection and audit purposes. These documents support IQ/OQ/PQ qualification of QAtrial as a GxP computerised system.

Document Overview

Document File Purpose
Installation Qualification (IQ) docs/validation/IQ.md Verifies that QAtrial is correctly installed and configured
Operational Qualification (OQ) docs/validation/OQ.md Verifies that QAtrial functions correctly per its specifications
Performance Qualification (PQ) docs/validation/PQ.md Template for customer-specific validation in the production environment
Compliance Statement docs/validation/Compliance-Statement.md Maps QAtrial features to regulatory requirements
Traceability Matrix docs/validation/Traceability-Matrix.md Maps regulatory requirements to QAtrial features and test IDs

Installation Qualification (IQ) -- 9 Test Steps

The IQ protocol verifies:

  1. Server starts successfully on the configured port
  2. PostgreSQL database is accessible and schema is applied
  3. Frontend application loads in a browser
  4. User registration creates an account, organization, and workspace
  5. User login returns valid JWT tokens
  6. File storage directory is writable
  7. Theme toggle works (light/dark)
  8. Language switching works
  9. Static assets are served correctly in production mode

Operational Qualification (OQ) -- 18 Test Steps

The OQ protocol verifies:

  1. Project setup wizard completes all 7 steps
  2. Requirement CRUD (create, read, update, delete) with auto seqId
  3. Test CRUD with requirement linking
  4. Traceability matrix shows correct links
  5. AI test generation produces valid results
  6. Electronic signature with re-authentication
  7. Evidence attachment and completeness tracking
  8. CSV export produces valid files
  9. CSV import with column mapping
  10. Design control (change control for strict verticals)
  11. ISO 13485 template loading
  12. CAPA lifecycle enforcement
  13. Audit mode (read-only link generation and access)
  14. RBAC (permission enforcement across 5 roles)
  15. Audit trail completeness and export
  16. Dashboard readiness score calculation
  17. Risk matrix display and classification
  18. Gap analysis execution

Performance Qualification (PQ) -- Template

The PQ document is a template with blanks for:

  • Customer environment details
  • Customer-specific test scenarios
  • Performance criteria (response times, concurrent users)
  • Data migration validation
  • Integration verification (Jira, GitHub, SSO)

Compliance Statement

The Compliance Statement maps QAtrial features to three regulatory frameworks:

21 CFR Part 11 -- Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (15 sections):

  • 11.10(a) through 11.10(k) -- System validation, record protection, audit trail, access control, etc.
  • 11.50 -- Signature manifestations
  • 11.70 -- Signature/record linking
  • 11.100 -- General requirements for electronic signatures
  • 11.200 -- Electronic signature components and controls

EU Annex 11 -- Computerised Systems (17 sections):

  • Sections 1-17 covering risk management, personnel, suppliers, data, accuracy checks, storage, printouts, audit trails, change management, incident management, electronic signatures, batch release, archiving, and business continuity

GAMP 5 -- Category 4 (Configured Products):

  • Covers the risk-based approach, specification, configuration management, testing, and release

Traceability Matrix

The Traceability Matrix maps 75 regulatory requirements across 6 standards to:

  • QAtrial features that implement or support each requirement
  • IQ/OQ/PQ test step IDs that verify compliance
  • Implementation status (Supported / Partial / Customer Responsibility)

Standards covered:

  1. 21 CFR Part 11
  2. EU Annex 11
  3. GAMP 5
  4. ISO 13485
  5. ISO 14971
  6. ICH Q10

6. Compliance Improvements

Real Signature Verification

QAtrial implements proper identity-based electronic signatures:

  • Real user identity: Signatures pull the authenticated user's name, role, and ID from useAuthStore, replacing placeholder values
  • Password re-authentication: Users must re-enter their password at the point of signing, with a 15-minute validity window per 21 CFR Part 11.200(a)
  • Non-repudiation: Each signature is bound to a verified user identity, supporting 21 CFR Part 11.70 non-repudiation requirements
  • Warning on unauthenticated signing: The system warns when no user is logged in, preventing anonymous signatures

These improvements strengthen compliance with:

  • 21 CFR Part 11 Subparts B and C (electronic signatures)
  • EU Annex 11 Section 14 (electronic signatures)
  • PMDA ER/ES Guidance (Japan)

Audit Auto-Logging

All requirement and test CRUD operations automatically generate audit trail entries with the real user identity:

  • No manual logging required: Create, update, delete, status change, link, and unlink operations are automatically captured
  • Real user attribution: Every audit entry includes the authenticated user's name, role, and ID
  • New audit actions: ai_generate, ai_accept, ai_reject, login, logout, and import are now tracked
  • AI provenance: AI-generated artifacts are logged with the model, provider, and acceptance/rejection status

This addresses:

  • 21 CFR Part 11.10(e) -- Audit trail requirement for electronic records
  • EU Annex 11 Section 9 -- Audit trail for GMP-critical data changes
  • FDA Data Integrity Guidance -- Attributable (who) requirement
  • MHRA Data Integrity Guidance -- Data lifecycle management

CAPA Lifecycle

The CAPA system implements a full lifecycle with formal status tracking:

open --> investigation --> in_progress --> verification --> resolved --> closed

Each status transition is logged in the audit trail. This structured lifecycle supports:

  • 21 CFR 820.90 -- Medical device CAPA requirements (formal investigation and effectiveness verification)
  • ISO 13485 Section 8.5.2/8.5.3 -- Corrective and preventive action with documented effectiveness
  • ICH Q10 Section 3.2 -- CAPA as part of the pharmaceutical quality system
  • EU GMP Chapter 1.4 -- Quality risk management and CAPA

Advanced RBAC (5 Roles)

The 5-role RBAC model with granular permissions supports:

Permission Regulatory Basis
Segregation of duties (author vs. approver) 21 CFR 11.10(d), EU Annex 11 Section 12
Read-only auditor access Audit and inspection access requirements
Reviewer role (approve without edit) Approval workflow requirements per GxP
Admin-only configuration System administration controls per 21 CFR 11.10(d)

Audit Mode (Read-Only Links)

The audit mode feature supports regulatory inspections by providing:

  • Time-limited access (24h/72h/7d) aligned with typical audit durations
  • No login required, reducing barriers for external auditors
  • Complete read-only view of all compliance-relevant data
  • Non-modifiable access that maintains data integrity during review

Webhook Notifications

Webhook event dispatch supports quality system integration by:

  • Providing real-time notifications of quality events (test failures, CAPA status changes, approvals)
  • Supporting integration with external quality management systems
  • HMAC signing ensures payload integrity and authenticity

Aerospace Vertical References

The Aerospace vertical (aerospace) includes templates aligned with:

  • AS9100D -- QMS requirements for aviation, space, and defense organizations
  • DO-178C -- Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification
  • DO-254 -- Design assurance for airborne electronic hardware
  • EASA Part 21 -- European Aviation Safety Agency certification
  • FAR Part 21 -- FAA type and production certification
  • NADCAP -- National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation

Risk taxonomy: FMEA with Design Assurance Level (DAL A-E) safety classification per DO-178C.

Chemical / Environmental Vertical References

The Chemical / Environmental vertical (chemical_env) includes templates aligned with:

  • REACH (EC 1907/2006) -- Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals
  • CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008) -- Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances and mixtures
  • TSCA -- US Toxic Substances Control Act
  • ISO 14001 -- Environmental Management Systems
  • ISO 45001 -- Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems
  • GHS -- Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals

Risk taxonomy: FMEA for process and environmental risk assessment.


7. Vertical-Depth Feature Regulatory Mapping

This section maps the vertical-depth features (Sprints 1-4) to the regulatory standards they address.

Medical Device Track

Complaint Management

Feature Regulatory Basis
Intake form with severity classification 21 CFR 820.198, ISO 13485 Section 8.2.2, EU MDR Article 87-92
Investigation workflow (received -> investigating -> resolved -> closed) 21 CFR 820.198(a), ISO 13485 Section 8.2.2
Trending dashboard (by month/severity/product/MTTR) 21 CFR 820.198(c) -- trending for signal detection, EU MDR Article 88
FSCA (Field Safety Corrective Action) tracking EU MDR Articles 82-86, MEDDEV 2.12/1 rev 8, 21 CFR 806 (Corrections and Removals)
CAPA linkage 21 CFR 820.90 -- CAPA from complaint investigation, ISO 13485 Section 8.5.2
Regulatory reportable flag 21 CFR 803 (MDR reporting), EU MDR Article 87 (Vigilance), MedWatch/MAUDE

Supplier Quality Scorecards

Feature Regulatory Basis
Performance metrics (defect rate, on-time delivery) ISO 13485 Section 7.4 (Purchasing), 21 CFR 820.50
Risk-based scoring ISO 13485 Section 7.4.1, ICH Q10 Section 2.7
Auto-requalification (score < 50 -> conditional) 21 CFR 820.50(a)(1) -- evaluation and re-evaluation criteria
Audit scheduling/tracking ISO 13485 Section 7.4.3, EU MDR Annex IX Section 3.4

Post-Market Surveillance (PMS)

Feature Regulatory Basis
Aggregated entries EU MDR Article 83 -- PMS system, 21 CFR 822 (Postmarket Surveillance)
PSUR data assembly EU MDR Article 86 -- Periodic Safety Update Report
Summary dashboard EU MDR Article 85 -- PMS report, MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 4

UDI Management

Feature Regulatory Basis
Device identifier tracking EU MDR Article 27-29, 21 CFR 830 (UDI system)
GUDID export FDA Global Unique Device Identification Database
EUDAMED export EU MDR Article 33 -- European Database on Medical Devices

Pharma Track

Electronic Batch Records

Feature Regulatory Basis
Template-driven records 21 CFR 211.186-188 (Master and batch production records), EU GMP Annex 11
Step execution with deviations 21 CFR 211.192 (Production record review), EU GMP Chapter 6
Review-by-exception FDA Guidance on Data Integrity (2018), EU GMP Annex 11 Section 10
E-signature release 21 CFR Part 11.50/11.70, EU Annex 11 Section 14
Yield calculation 21 CFR 211.103 (Calculation of yield), EU GMP Chapter 6.18

Stability Study Manager

Feature Regulatory Basis
ICH Q1A design ICH Q1A(R2) -- Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products
Storage conditions (long-term, intermediate, accelerated) ICH Q1A Section 2.2.1-2.2.3
Pull schedules ICH Q1A Section 2.2.7 -- Testing frequency
OOS/OOT auto-detection ICH Q1E -- Evaluation of Stability Data, 21 CFR 211.166
Trending charts ICH Q1E -- Statistical analysis of stability data

Environmental Monitoring

Feature Regulatory Basis
Monitoring points with thresholds EU GMP Annex 1 (2022) -- Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products
Readings with auto-excursion detection EU GMP Annex 1 Section 9, USP <1116>
Trending FDA Guidance on Sterile Drug Products (2004), PDA TR 13

Training Management (LMS-lite)

Feature Regulatory Basis
Training plans 21 CFR 211.25 (Personnel qualifications), EU GMP Chapter 2
Courses and records ISO 13485 Section 6.2, 21 CFR 820.25
Training matrix ICH Q10 Section 2.2 -- Pharmaceutical Quality System personnel
Compliance dashboard 21 CFR 211.25(a) -- training documentation availability
Auto-retraining triggers ISO 13485 Section 6.2 -- competence review after changes, 21 CFR 820.25(b)

Software/GAMP Track

Live Impact Analysis

Feature Regulatory Basis
Requirement/test graph chains IEC 62304 Section 5.7 -- Software verification traceability
What-if analysis GAMP 5 2nd Edition -- Change and configuration management, ICH Q10 Section 3.2.4

Computerized System Inventory

Feature Regulatory Basis
GAMP 5 categories GAMP 5 2nd Edition -- System categorization (Cat 1/3/4/5)
Validation status tracking EU Annex 11 Section 4 -- Validation, 21 CFR Part 11 preamble
Risk levels GAMP 5 -- Risk-based approach to validation
Overdue detection EU Annex 11 Section 11 -- Periodic evaluation, PIC/S PI 011

Periodic Review Automation

Feature Regulatory Basis
7-step wizard EU Annex 11 Section 11 -- Periodic evaluation of computerised systems
Auto-pull data GAMP 5 -- Periodic review supporting data collection
Schedule next review EU Annex 11 Section 11, PIC/S PI 011 -- Review frequency

Cross-Vertical Features

Document Lifecycle Management

Feature Regulatory Basis
SOP versioning (draft -> review -> approved -> effective -> superseded -> retired) 21 CFR 820.40 (Document controls), ISO 13485 Section 4.2.4/4.2.5, EU GMP Chapter 4
Version history 21 CFR 820.40(b) -- Changes to documents, ISO 13485 Section 4.2.4
Distribution tracking 21 CFR 820.40(b) -- Distribution of approved documents, EU GMP Chapter 4.3

Closed-Loop CAPA Enhancement

Feature Regulatory Basis
Cascade triggers (SOP update) ISO 13485 Section 8.5.2 -- Integration of CAPA with document control
Cascade triggers (retraining) 21 CFR 211.25 -- Retraining after procedural changes, EU GMP Chapter 2.12

Audit Management

Feature Regulatory Basis
Schedule ISO 13485 Section 8.2.4 -- Internal audit planning, 21 CFR 820.22
Findings tracker ISO 19011:2018 -- Guidelines for auditing management systems
CAPA linkage ISO 13485 Section 8.2.4 -- Audit follow-up actions, 21 CFR 820.22
Classification (observation/minor/major/critical) ISO 19011 -- Audit finding classification, EU GMP Chapter 9